Algorithmic Trading Models & Market Timing Signals

Compare rules-based Grizzly Bulls models that use technical, volatility, macroeconomic, and monetary-policy inputs to produce market-timing signals. Review current signals, historical results, drawdowns, trade history, and methodology before deciding whether any model fits your process.
Model architecture

How the model families differ

The lineup includes distinct technical strategies plus a volatility-centered family. The combined VIX models add technical, macroeconomic, and monetary-policy inputs as their scope becomes broader.

Technical foundations

Two different ways to read price behavior

These free models isolate contrasting technical approaches rather than stacking the same rule set.

Volatility-centered family

From focused volatility signals to broader context

VIX Basic and VIX Advanced stay focused on volatility. The combined models then add technical, macroeconomic, and monetary-policy context.

  1. 01Free account
    VIX Basic
    Volatility
  2. 02Bronze
    VIX Advanced
    Volatility
  3. 03Silver
    VIX-TA Advanced
    VolatilityTechnical
  4. 04Gold
    VIX-TA-Macro Advanced
    VolatilityTechnicalMacro
  5. 05Platinum
    VIX-TA-Macro-MP Extreme
    VolatilityTechnicalMacroMonetary policy

This is a conceptual map of the published input families, not a claim that every model is a nested implementation of the one before it.

Compare the model lineup

Each card links to a model research page with historical statistics and model-specific documentation. Current signals are shown when your access level permits them; locked signals remain unavailable until the corresponding account or subscription requirement is met.

At-a-glance comparison

Compare access, inputs, signal and historical profile

Use this as an orientation layer, then open the model page for the full trade history, methodology, live-performance boundary, and implementation context.

ModelAccessPrimary inputsCurrent signalHistorical CAGRMax drawdown
TA-MR BasicPublic
Technical · mean reversion
Loading…17.18%-25.30%
TA-Trend BasicPublic
Technical · trend
Loading…14.78%-28.61%
VIX BasicFree account
Volatility
Loading…19.18%-26.00%
VIX AdvancedBronze
Volatility
Loading…24.63%-25.71%
VIX-TA AdvancedSilver
VolatilityTechnical
Loading…27.99%-24.76%
VIX-TA-Macro AdvancedGold
VolatilityTechnicalMacro
Loading…38.26%-20.68%
VIX-TA-Macro-MP ExtremePlatinum
VolatilityTechnicalMacroMonetary policy
Loading…46.04%-18.33%

Historical CAGR and max drawdown come from the same reviewed model summary data used on the individual model pages. The historical record combines backtest and subsequent live periods, and historical results are not a forecast of future performance.

How to evaluate historical results

The individual model pages separate historical research from the live signal experience and disclose where live trading begins for each model. Their historical trade records combine a backtest period with subsequent live performance, so the two periods should not be interpreted as identical evidence.

The common historical window begins on April 20, 2009, the first date in the dataset with full VIX futures-curve information. Historical CAGR, win rate, drawdown, and trade results describe the reviewed sample; they are not guarantees of future returns and can be affected in practice by execution, taxes, slippage, spreads, position sizing, and differences between a user's implementation and the modeled rules.

Free and premium access

The lineup includes models available without a paid plan as well as Bronze, Silver, Gold, and Platinum models. Paid tiers add access to progressively broader model combinations and product features. Check the model cards and plan pages for current access and pricing.

Start with the free models if you want to understand how Grizzly Bulls presents signals and historical research before considering a paid strategy. Existing subscribers can open any model card to review the research available for their tier.

How it works

Understand the mechanics behind the models

Market timing is not risk-free

A systematic model can reduce discretionary decision-making, but it cannot eliminate model risk, whipsaws, regime changes, execution differences, or the possibility of underperforming a passive benchmark. A strategy that avoided one historical drawdown can still react poorly to a future market environment that differs from its research sample.

Use the model pages as research and decision-support material. Review the methodology and historical record, consider implementation costs and tax consequences, and avoid allocating capital solely because a backtest or current signal looks attractive in isolation.