Algorithmic Trading Models & Market Timing Signals

Compare rules-based Grizzly Bulls models that use technical, volatility, macroeconomic, and monetary-policy inputs to produce market-timing signals. Review current signals, historical results, drawdowns, trade history, and methodology before deciding whether any model fits your process.
Get Started Free

Compare the model lineup

Each card links to a model research page with historical statistics and model-specific documentation. Current signals are shown when your access level permits them; locked signals remain unavailable until the corresponding account or subscription requirement is met.

What the signals represent

Grizzly Bulls models are rules-based trading systems rather than discretionary forecasts. Different model families emphasize different evidence: technical mean reversion, technical trend following, volatility, macroeconomic conditions, and monetary-policy context. The model lineup combines those inputs in progressively broader ways rather than treating every signal as the output of one identical formula.

A current model signal is an actionable state produced by that model's rules. It should be evaluated together with the model's historical behavior, expected trade frequency, drawdowns, access level, and your own portfolio constraints rather than treated as a standalone prediction of the market's next move.

How to evaluate historical results

The individual model pages separate historical research from the live signal experience and disclose where live trading begins for each model. Their historical trade records combine a backtest period with subsequent live performance, so the two periods should not be interpreted as identical evidence.

The common historical window begins on April 20, 2009, the first date in the dataset with full VIX futures-curve information. Historical CAGR, win rate, drawdown, and trade results describe the reviewed sample; they are not guarantees of future returns and can be affected in practice by execution, taxes, slippage, spreads, position sizing, and differences between a user's implementation and the modeled rules.

Free and premium access

The lineup includes models available without a paid plan as well as Bronze, Silver, Gold, and Platinum models. Paid tiers add access to progressively broader model combinations and product features. Check the model cards and plan pages for current access and pricing.

Start with the free models if you want to understand how Grizzly Bulls presents signals and historical research before considering a paid strategy. Existing subscribers can open any model card to review the research available for their tier.

Compare plans

How it works

1Sign upCreate your free account2Follow modelsTrack our live signals3OutperformUpgrade when you need more
Learn how signals are delivered

Understand the mechanics behind the models

How algorithmic trading systems workFollow the full educational guide from data and signals through backtesting, execution, and live monitoring.How to evaluate market timingReview timing strategy families, evidence standards, buy-and-hold comparisons, and common failure modes.Algorithmic trading definitionUse the encyclopedia entry for the concise concept definition and core vocabulary.BacktestingReview what a historical simulation can establish and where backtest evidence can mislead.Build an algorithmic trading backtesterFollow the existing Node.js implementation tutorial and related backtesting series.Market indicatorsExplore Grizzly Bulls valuation, sentiment, and macroeconomic indicators.

Market timing is not risk-free

A systematic model can reduce discretionary decision-making, but it cannot eliminate model risk, whipsaws, regime changes, execution differences, or the possibility of underperforming a passive benchmark. A strategy that avoided one historical drawdown can still react poorly to a future market environment that differs from its research sample.

Use the model pages as research and decision-support material. Review the methodology and historical record, consider implementation costs and tax consequences, and avoid allocating capital solely because a backtest or current signal looks attractive in isolation.