Financial research concept

Average Daily Rate (ADR): Hotel Room Pricing Explained

Average daily rate measures room revenue per occupied room sold and helps separate hotel pricing and mix from occupancy-driven demand.

By Lee BaileyPublished Sep 16, 2026

Average daily rate, commonly abbreviated ADR, measures room revenue earned per occupied room sold during a period.

A common formula is:

text
1Average Daily Rate = Room Revenue ÷ Rooms Sold

ADR is one of the two main operating components of Revenue per Available Room. The other is Hotel Occupancy Rate.

ADR measures realized room revenue, not the posted room price

A hotel's published nightly price is not the same thing as ADR.

Actual room revenue can reflect:

  • weekday versus weekend pricing;
  • seasonality;
  • transient versus group business;
  • negotiated corporate rates;
  • promotions and discounts;
  • room-type mix;
  • loyalty redemptions and program economics;
  • geography and brand mix; and
  • changes in the mix of hotels included in the reported portfolio.

ADR therefore behaves more like a realized average room-rate measure than a clean list-price index.

If a hotel posts a $250 standard rate but sells a mix of rooms at $180, $220, and $300, the realized ADR depends on the actual room revenue and occupied-room count, not the headline price displayed to a traveler.

ADR and occupancy answer different questions

ADR asks what the hotel earned in room revenue per room sold. Occupancy asks what share of available room capacity was sold.

With consistent definitions:

text
1RevPAR = ADR × Occupancy Rate

Suppose two hotels each report $150 RevPAR:

text
1Hotel A: $200 ADR × 75% occupancy = $150 RevPAR
2Hotel B: $250 ADR × 60% occupancy = $150 RevPAR

Their RevPAR is identical, but their demand and pricing profiles are not.

Hotel A fills more of its capacity at a lower average rate. Hotel B realizes a higher rate but leaves more rooms unsold. That distinction can affect operating costs, ancillary revenue opportunities, and the sensitivity of profit to changes in demand.

Higher ADR is not automatically better performance

ADR can increase because a company genuinely raised rates at comparable hotels. It can also rise because the reported mix shifted toward luxury properties, expensive markets, higher-value room types, or peak-season dates.

Similarly, an operator can protect ADR by accepting lower occupancy. That may or may not be the economically best trade-off depending on variable costs, ancillary spending, customer acquisition channels, and future demand.

Investors should avoid treating ADR growth as pure pricing power without checking occupancy and mix.

Comparable-property scope matters

Large lodging companies often report ADR across comparable hotels, geographic regions, brand tiers, or ownership arrangements.

A portfolio that adds luxury hotels can show a higher systemwide ADR even if room rates at existing hotels barely change. Foreign-exchange movements can also change reported ADR for international systems unless the company presents constant-currency statistics.

Useful comparison questions include:

  • Is the metric comparable-system or total-system?
  • Is it reported or constant currency?
  • Which brands or chain scales are included?
  • Are managed, franchised, owned, and leased hotels combined?
  • Did acquisitions, dispositions, openings, closures, or renovations change the mix?

ADR is not revenue per available room

ADR uses rooms sold in the denominator. RevPAR uses rooms available.

That means ADR can rise while RevPAR falls if occupancy declines enough.

For example:

text
1Period 1: $200 ADR × 80% occupancy = $160 RevPAR
2Period 2: $210 ADR × 70% occupancy = $147 RevPAR

ADR rose 5%, but the loss of occupied rooms more than offset the higher realized rate.

This is why ADR should not be used alone as the hotel equivalent of same-store sales or total room-revenue growth.

Filing examples

Marriott defines ADR as property-level room revenue divided by total rooms sold and uses it with occupancy to explain RevPAR. Hilton's 2025 filing similarly attributes changes in comparable franchised-hotel RevPAR to changes in occupancy and ADR. Hyatt describes ADR as the average room rate and explains why rate-driven RevPAR changes can have different incremental-profit implications from occupancy-driven changes.

Sources:

Bottom line

ADR measures realized room revenue per occupied room, not the advertised nightly price or room revenue per available room. Preserve occupancy, property mix, brand, geography, currency, comparable-hotel scope, and distribution mix before using ADR growth as evidence of hotel pricing strength.

Part of the Hotel Operating Model

Connect occupancy, room rates, RevPAR, room growth, franchise fees, and management fees to understand hotel demand and fee economics.

How the model fits together
  • Room demand and pricing: RevPAR equals ADR multiplied by occupancy when definitions are consistent. ADR measures room revenue per room sold while occupancy measures rooms sold relative to rooms available.
  • Asset-light system growth: Net rooms growth expands or contracts the hotel system. Franchise fees and management fees monetize that system through different contracts, so room growth does not translate one-for-one into fee revenue.

See It in Company Research

These companies are examples of how the concept is reported or discussed in public filings. Definitions can differ by issuer; these links open company research rather than a normalized metric comparison.

Continue Research

Continue from the concept into the Grizzly Bulls research surface that best matches the next question. These links are research continuations, not recommendations or required steps.

Compare stocks

Compare lodging companies

Continue into stock comparison for lodging demand, pricing, growth, and valuation context.

Explore more topics in the Financial Research Encyclopedia.