An auto dealer same-store basis compares dealership results using a relatively stable store cohort rather than letting acquisitions, divestitures, or new locations dominate the year-over-year change.
That distinction matters because buying and selling dealerships is part of the business model. AutoNation says the gap between reported and same-store revenue and gross profit reflects acquisition and divestiture activity plus openings of AutoNation USA used-vehicle stores. Penske and Sonic also reconcile reported results to same-store populations, but their inclusion rules are issuer-specific.
Acquisitions can hide the operating trend
Reported growth answers what happened to the consolidated company. Same-store growth asks whether the legacy footprint actually improved. A dealer group can grow reported revenue after buying stores even while the existing locations sell fewer vehicles.
The same boundary should carry into per-unit measures. AutoNation's 2025 same-store new-vehicle revenue per retail unit was $52,097, while Penske reported $59,114 on its own same-store basis. Those figures are useful inside each issuer's framework, but the cohort rules are not automatically identical.
The definition travels with the issuer
A store may enter the comparable base after a specified ownership period, and acquisitions, dispositions, open points, geography, agency sales, or dedicated used-car stores can receive different treatment. Sonic, for example, describes currently operating stores entering its same-store group after the first full month following the first anniversary of opening or acquisition.
For investors, same-store treatment is therefore a comparison method, not a standardized accounting measure. Read the cohort rule before comparing gross profit per retail unit, fixed operations, or F&I across companies.
Primary sources: AutoNation 2025 Form 10-K, Penske Automotive Group 2025 Form 10-K, and Sonic Automotive 2025 Form 10-K.
Part of the Automotive Dealership Economics
See It in Company Research
These companies are examples of how the concept is reported or discussed in public filings. Definitions can differ by issuer; these links open company research rather than a normalized metric comparison.
- ANOpen operating-model research →10 of 10 reviewed concepts in Automotive Dealership EconomicsSame-store vehicle transaction and front-end economics5 of 5 bridge concepts supportedContinue through this bridge:New-Vehicle Gross Profit per UnitNew-Vehicle Revenue per UnitUsed-Vehicle Gross Profit per UnitUsed-Vehicle Revenue per Unit
- PAGOpen operating-model research →8 of 10 reviewed concepts in Automotive Dealership EconomicsSame-store vehicle transaction and front-end economics5 of 5 bridge concepts supportedContinue through this bridge:New-Vehicle Gross Profit per UnitNew-Vehicle Revenue per UnitUsed-Vehicle Gross Profit per UnitUsed-Vehicle Revenue per Unit
- SAHOpen operating-model research →6 of 10 reviewed concepts in Automotive Dealership EconomicsSame-store vehicle transaction and front-end economics3 of 5 bridge concepts supportedContinue through this bridge:New-Vehicle Gross Profit per UnitUsed-Vehicle Gross Profit per Unit
Continue Research
Continue from the concept into the Grizzly Bulls research surface that best matches the next question. These links are research continuations, not recommendations or required steps.
Compare dealership cohorts
Compare dealer operating trends on a stable-store basis before acquisitions, dispositions, open points, or cohort rules distort the read.
Explore more topics in the Financial Research Encyclopedia.