Diagnostic Lab Revenue per Requisition Change measures the year-over-year change in revenue generated per Quest Diagnostics requisition.
Quest Diagnostics reported 0.1% revenue-per-requisition change in 2025.
Monetization change was tiny beside volume growth
Reported requisition volume grew 12.3%.
The spread between 12.3% volume growth and 0.1% revenue-per-requisition change was 12.2 percentage points.
Revenue growth therefore depended far more on volume than unit monetization
The comparison indicates that acquisitions and requisition growth were the dominant growth engine, while revenue per requisition was nearly flat.
Use Diagnostic Lab Requisition Volume Growth to pair the unit metric with the volume driver.
Revenue per requisition is not a price index
Payer mix, test mix, business mix, tests per requisition, and pricing all affect the measure.
A 0.1% change cannot be interpreted as pure pricing.
Primary source: Quest Diagnostics 2025 Form 10-K.
Part of the Diagnostic Laboratory Economics
See It in Company Research
These companies are examples of how the concept is reported or discussed in public filings. Definitions can differ by issuer; these links open company research rather than a normalized metric comparison.
- DGXOpen operating-model research →17 of 17 reviewed concepts in Diagnostic Laboratory EconomicsRequisition growth and monetization6 of 6 bridge concepts supportedContinue through this bridge:Diagnostic Information Services RevenueDiagnostic Lab Organic Requisition Volume GrowthDiagnostic Lab Requisition Volume GrowthDiagnostic Lab Test Requisition VolumeDiagnostic Solutions Revenue
Continue Research
Continue from the concept into the Grizzly Bulls research surface that best matches the next question. These links are research continuations, not recommendations or required steps.
Compare public companies
Compare near-flat unit monetization with double-digit requisition growth without treating the metric as pure price.
Explore more topics in the Financial Research Encyclopedia.