← Grizzly Bulls Research

Applied Digital AI Data Center Economics: Campus Yields and Capital Stack

Three Disclosed Campuses Imply 11.8%-13.4% Midpoint Site-NOI Yields, but Macquarie's 12.75% Preferred Changes the Equity Math
By Lee BaileyPublished September 25, 2026Evidence reviewed through September 25, 2026Version 1.0
What the project economics say

The campuses look attractive. The capital stack is the harder part.

Applied Digital discloses enough detail to underwrite three of its five contracted AI campuses without treating the $36.2B backlog as equity value. Those three projects cover 900 MW and imply a 12.56%aggregate midpoint site-NOI yield on development cost. The common shareholder still sits behind secured debt and Macquarie preferred capital, so the attractive asset-level return doesn't flow straight through to the stock.

12.56%Three-campus midpoint site-NOI yield on cost
11.20% to 14.18% mechanical range
900 MWCapacity with disclosed margin and capex assumptions
63.83% of the contracted portfolio
≈5.1 ppMidpoint project-yield spread over disclosed secured-debt coupon
Nearly identical at PF1 and PF2 despite different coupons
1.86xFive-year preferred accretion at the 12.75% base rate
Above the 1.80x minimum MOIC before step-ups or common value
This is a project-economics study, not a stock-price target. Site NOI is management's non-GAAP project metric, and the derived yield ranges are mechanical scenarios rather than probability estimates.

Three campuses support a low-teens development-yield model

The headline $36.2B backlog spans five campuses, but management has published both a site-NOI margin range and an $11M-$13M anticipated capex-per-MW range for only Polaris Forge 1, Polaris Forge 2, and Delta Forge 1. These 900 MW cover 63.83% of contracted capacity and 64.92%of base-term contracted revenue, so the study doesn't impute those economics to Polaris Forge 3 or Delta Forge 2.

Stabilized site-NOI yield on development cost

Low cases pair the low end of management's site-NOI margin range with $13M/MW capex. High cases pair the high end with $11M/MW capex. The marker is the midpoint margin at $12M/MW.
Units: PercentData: September 25, 2026

Polaris Forge 1 ranges from 11.99% to 15.17% with a 13.44% midpoint. Polaris Forge 2 ranges from 10.64% to 13.48% with a 11.94% midpoint. Delta Forge 1 ranges from 10.51% to 13.33% with a 11.81% midpoint.

Polaris Forge 113.44%
400 MW · $11B base-term revenue · 88% midpoint site-NOI margin
Polaris Forge 211.94%
200 MW · $5B base-term revenue · 86% midpoint site-NOI margin
Delta Forge 111.81%
300 MW · $7.5B base-term revenue · 85% midpoint site-NOI margin
CampusMW15-year revenueAnnual revenue / MWSite-NOI marginMidpoint annual site NOIMidpoint costMidpoint yield
Polaris Forge 1400$11B$1.83M88% ± 3 pp$645M$4.8B13.44%
Polaris Forge 2200$5B$1.67M86% ± 3 pp$287M$2.4B11.94%
Delta Forge 1300$7.5B$1.67M85% ± 3 pp$425M$3.6B11.81%

Cheaper PF2 debt preserves almost the same project spread

PF1's disclosed secured notes total $3.94B across a 9.25% tranche and a 7.0% tranche, for a principal-weighted stated coupon of 8.34%. PF2's $2.15B secured notes carry a 6.75% coupon. Comparing those coupons with the midpoint project yields produces nearly the same spread at both campuses.

Midpoint project yield versus disclosed secured-debt coupon

The open point is Grizzly Bulls' midpoint site-NOI yield on total development cost. The filled point is the principal-weighted stated coupon on disclosed secured notes.
Units: PercentData: September 25, 2026
Midpoint site-NOI yield on costStated secured-debt coupon

PF1 midpoint site-NOI yield is 13.44% versus an 8.34% weighted coupon, a 5.10 percentage-point spread. PF2 midpoint yield is 11.94% versus a 6.75% coupon, a 5.19 percentage-point spread.

Polaris Forge 113.44%8.34%
5.10 pp spread · estimated site NOI equals 1.96x annual stated coupon interest
Polaris Forge 211.94%6.75%
5.19 pp spread · estimated site NOI equals 1.98x annual stated coupon interest

Macquarie's preferred return is the expensive layer

As of May 31, Macquarie had funded $1.825B of TopCo 2 preferred capital and held 13.5% of its fully diluted common equity. The preferred units accrue at 12.75% and compound semiannually, while the liquidation preference carries a 1.80x minimum MOIC, increasing to 2.00x in certain liquidity events.

What 12.75% semiannual compounding does to $1 of preferred capital

The rising line assumes the disclosed base preferred rate is paid entirely in kind. The flat line shows the 1.8x minimum MOIC.
Units: Multiple of original investmentData: Base-rate illustration
12.75% base-rate accretion1.8x minimum MOIC

At the disclosed 12.75% base rate compounded semiannually, $1 accretes to 1.86x after five years and crosses the 1.8x minimum MOIC after about 4.76 years.

How the economic claim reaches APLD common shareholders

This ordering is conceptual. Exact legal waterfalls vary by project entity and financing document.

Lease revenue supports site NOI. Secured debt service and preferred capital claims sit ahead of the residual common-equity economics available to Applied Digital shareholders.

  1. Tenant lease
    $23.5B reviewed base-term revenue
    PF1, PF2, and Delta Forge 1 provide the detailed operating assumptions used in this study.
  2. Stabilized site NOI
    12.56% midpoint yield on cost
    Calculated from disclosed lease revenue, site-NOI margins, and capex-per-MW assumptions.
  3. Secured debt
    6.75%-9.25% disclosed coupons
    Project notes carry amortization, covenants, reserves, fees, and other terms beyond the headline coupon.
  4. Preferred capital
    12.75% base rate + 1.8x floor
    Macquarie also holds common equity in TopCo 2.
  5. Residual common economics
    What remains after senior claims
    This is why $36.2B of contracted revenue can't be compared directly with APLD common-equity value.

Methodology and limits

Project calculations

  • Base-term contracted revenue divided by 15 years.
  • Contracted MW multiplied by $12M/MW, the midpoint of management's $11M-$13M/MW anticipated capex range.
  • Annual contracted revenue multiplied by management's midpoint expected site NOI margin.
  • Low case pairs the low end of management's site NOI margin range with $13M/MW capex. High case pairs the high end with $11M/MW capex. These are mechanical scenario endpoints, not confidence intervals.

What the study doesn't claim

  • Project-level site NOI margins and $11M-$13M/MW anticipated capex are disclosed for Polaris Forge 1, Polaris Forge 2, and Delta Forge 1. The study does not impute those assumptions to Polaris Forge 3 or Delta Forge 2.
  • Stated secured-note coupons are compared with midpoint site NOI yield on total development cost. The site-NOI-to-coupon-interest ratio divides estimated annual site NOI by annual stated coupon interest on disclosed note principal. It is not DSCR and excludes amortization, issue discounts, fees, reserves, preferred distributions, corporate costs, and other financing claims.
  • The study doesn't assign a terminal cap rate, stock price target, future refinancing spread, or value to uncontracted pipeline capacity.
  • Management's site NOI is a non-GAAP project metric and may not translate one-for-one into consolidated company cash flow.

Sources and calculations

The operating and financing inputs come from Applied Digital's SEC-filed investor materials, fiscal 2026 Form 10-K, project-financing Forms 8-K, and fiscal 2026 fourth-quarter release. Grizzly Bulls performs the annualization, yield-on-cost, weighted-coupon, coupon-interest, coverage, and preferred-accretion calculations shown above.

Applied Digital fiscal 2026 Form 10-K

Applied Digital / U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · source date May 31, 2026

Open primary source →

Applied Digital 2026 investor presentation

Applied Digital / U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · source date April 23, 2026

Open primary source →

Polaris Forge 2 senior secured notes Form 8-K

Applied Digital / U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · source date March 10, 2026

Open primary source →

Polaris Forge 1 Building 4 senior secured notes Form 8-K

Applied Digital / U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · source date June 16, 2026

Open primary source →

Applied Digital fiscal 2026 fourth-quarter earnings release

Applied Digital / U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · source date July 27, 2026

Open primary source →

Research data

Public study files are available for verification and analysis. The Grizzly Bulls Data License covers these public downloads; third-party source records retain their own rights. Reuse terms →
  • CSVCSV download
    Campus-level disclosed inputs and Grizzly Bulls yield-on-cost calculations for PF1, PF2, and Delta Forge 1.
    Data snapshot September 25, 2026 · Reuse with attribution to the canonical study.
    Download CSV
  • JSONJSON download
    Structured project economics, secured-debt comparisons, preferred-accretion series, methodology, and public source links.
    Data snapshot September 25, 2026 · Reuse with attribution to the canonical study.
    Download JSON

Research standards

See how Grizzly Bulls separates source facts, calculations, and interpretation.

Read the research standards →

Corrections and press

Questions about a source, calculation, or reuse request can go through the public research contact path.

Research and corrections contact →

Citation and reuse

Lee Bailey. “Applied Digital AI Data Center Economics: Campus Yields and Capital Stack: Three Disclosed Campuses Imply 11.8%-13.4% Midpoint Site-NOI Yields, but Macquarie's 12.75% Preferred Changes the Equity Math.” Grizzly Bulls, September 25, 2026. Version 1.0. Data snapshot September 25, 2026. https://grizzlybulls.com/research/applied-digital-ai-data-center-economics
Public CSV and JSON files are provided for verification and new analysis. Third-party filings and investor materials retain their own rights.