.jpg?width=480)
Actor and director
Kristen Stewart
Base case$80M
Estimate confidence
★★★★★
3 out of 5.jpg?width=384)
Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 2.0
Mila Kunis Net Worth Estimate
Actor and producerMila Kunis’s $75M base case reflects repeated Forbes earnings of $11M and $15.5M across film, voice work and endorsements.
Published estimateReviewed Oct 14, 2026
Research context
See what supports this page, how current it is, and where comparable or historical context is available.
- Evidence
- 2 retained sourcesReviewed through Oct 14, 2026
- Change history
- 1 tracked snapshotComparable tracking began Sep 18, 2026
- Comparison context
- 1 reviewed peer rankingPeer lists preserve the same base-case estimate and uncertainty range.
Current estimate
What we can support today
Base case
$75M
Bear case
$45M
Bull case
$120M
Estimate confidence
3 out of 5
Why this estimate
- Main wealth driver
- Estimated retained film, television and endorsement capital ($75M base case)
- Estimate confidence
- 3 out of 5
- Key evidence
- Forbes placed Kunis at $11M in its 2016 highest-paid actress ranking.Sources[1]
- Biggest uncertainty
- How much of Kunis’s historical film, voice and endorsement income remains invested today?
- Evidence reviewed through
- Oct 14, 2026
Base case is our central scenario. Bear and bull cases show how uncertainty around private holdings, retained proceeds, taxes and liabilities can move the estimate.
Celebrity rankings
Explore this profile in context
Rankings use the current base-case estimate and show the wider bear-to-bull range on the full list.
Scenario composition
Where the estimated wealth comes from
Switch scenarios to see how the total and each component move together. The bars show each positive component's share of the estimated assets in that scenario, not audited holdings.
Bear scenario net worth$45MPositive estimated assets shown: $45M
Estimated retained film, television and endorsement capital
$45M to $120M range$45M100%
Base scenario net worth$75MPositive estimated assets shown: $75M
Estimated retained film, television and endorsement capital
$45M to $120M range$75M100%
Bull scenario net worth$120MPositive estimated assets shown: $120M
Estimated retained film, television and endorsement capital
$45M to $120M range$120M100%
How Mila Kunis Built a Fortune
Forbes placed Kunis at $11M in 2016, citing Bad Moms, Family Guy and endorsement work. It then placed her at $15.5M in 2017 as film economics improved while recurring voice and commercial income continued.
Those consecutive eight-figure observations are more useful than a single salary rumor because they show a diversified earning base across multiple forms of entertainment work.
The public record tells us much more about what Kunis earned than about what she retained. Taxes, fees, spending, investments, production interests, property equity and liabilities are not publicly complete.
The estimate therefore uses a broad retained-capital range rather than assuming historical gross earnings stayed intact.
Sources[1][2]Observed assets and financial anchors
A reported salary, company sale or brand valuation is not automatically current personal wealth. We show the pieces that can be tied to retained evidence and keep historical flows separate.
No major component is directly observable as a precise current valueThis estimate is built from source-backed financial anchors and explicitly modeled scenario ranges rather than pretending a private balance sheet is directly observable.
Scenario balance sheet
The estimate uses repeated person-level earnings as historical-flow evidence. It does not treat old film, voice or endorsement income as current cash or assign unsupported values to private production interests.
| Component | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated retained film, television and endorsement capitalSources[1][2] | $45M | $75M | $120M |
| Estimated net worth | $45M | $75M | $120M |
Modeled component
Estimated retained film, television and endorsement capital
Forbes placed Kunis at $11M in its 2016 highest-paid actress ranking, citing Bad Moms, Family Guy and endorsement work, then at $15.5M in 2017 as Bad Moms strengthened her film economics while voice and commercial income continued. Repeated eight-figure annual observations across multiple income streams materially constrain earning power, but they do not reveal current investments, production interests, property, taxes, spending, transfers or liabilities.
Sources[1][2]Tracked estimates
Estimate history
We began retaining comparable estimate snapshots on Sep 18, 2026. Earlier Grizzly Bulls figures are not reconstructed unless a retained snapshot exists.
- Current tracked estimateBase case$75MBear to bull$45M to $120M
Initial Grizzly Bulls estimate published with repeated eight-figure film, voice and endorsement earnings separated from current retained personal capital.
This is the first retained snapshot, so there is no earlier comparable Grizzly Bulls estimate to show yet.
What could move the estimate
- How much of Kunis’s historical film, voice and endorsement income remains invested today?
- What current value is attributable to production interests and other private holdings?
- What property equity, taxes, spending, transfers and liabilities materially affect current retained wealth?
Wealth timeline
Related celebrity net-worth estimates
Explore other estimates for people with similar careers, industries or estimated wealth.
.jpg?width=480)
%20(cropped).jpg?width=480)
Sources
Numbered citations above link to the retained sources below. External net-worth headlines do not set our estimate.
- [1]ForbesReporting · Sep 1, 2016The World's Highest-Paid Actresses 2016: Mila Kunis
- [2]ForbesReporting · Aug 15, 2017The World's Highest-Paid Actresses 2017: Mila Kunis
See something we should revisit?Report a correction