Grizzly Bulls
Financial research concept

Online Gaming Average Revenue per Monthly Payer

measures monthly platform revenue relative to average paying-user scale, combining product mix, engagement, promotions, and sports outcomes.

By Lee BaileyPublished Sep 29, 2026
Research context

See what supports this page, how current it is, and where comparable or historical context is available.

Research date
Sep 29, 2026Use the dated article and cited sources for the definition, examples, and stated limitations.
Operating-model context
10 connected conceptsPart of the reviewed Online Sports Betting & iGaming Economics; issuer definitions remain distinct where disclosed.
Company examples
1 reviewed companyRelationships reflect supported examples, not a normalized cross-company KPI ranking.
  1. ARPMUP is a platform monetization measure
  2. Revenue per payer is not customer lifetime value
  3. Part of the Online Sports Betting & iGaming Economics
  4. See It in Company Research
  5. Continue Research

Online gaming average revenue per monthly payer measures average monthly revenue divided by average monthly unique payers over the same reporting period.

DraftKings calls the metric ARPMUP. It reported $132 in Q2 2026, down about 13%, or $19, from the prior-year quarter.

ARPMUP is a platform monetization measure

A higher value can reflect deeper engagement, richer product mix, stronger sportsbook hold, higher iGaming monetization, or more customers using multiple offerings.

It can also fall when sports results are customer-friendly or when the operator increases promotional reinvestment. That is why ARPMUP should be read with monthly unique payers, not used as a stand-alone pricing metric.

Revenue per payer is not customer lifetime value

ARPMUP is a period-average revenue statistic. It does not deduct acquisition cost, gaming taxes, platform costs, promotions already reflected in revenue presentation, or other expenses needed to estimate customer economics.

It also spans DraftKings' current product mix, including Sportsbook, iGaming, Fantasy, Lottery, Prediction Markets, and other offerings. Sports net revenue margin isolates a different part of the model by relating sports revenue to sports volume.

Primary sources: DraftKings Q2 2026 earnings release and DraftKings Q2 2026 Form 10-Q.

Part of the Online Sports Betting & iGaming Economics

Connect paying-user scale and monetization with sports wagering volume, sportsbook revenue and realized margin, iGaming revenue, and the structural, sports-result, and promotional drivers of sportsbook hold.

Browse the full operating model in Company Analysis →
Where this concept fits
  • Player scale and monetizationCurrent relationship
    Monthly Unique Payers measure DraftKings platform-level paying-user scale, ARPMUP measures average revenue across that payer base, and Flutter iGaming AMPs isolate product-category player activity under a different methodology. These user metrics are complementary but not standardized synonyms.
    iGaming Average Monthly PlayersAverage Revenue per Monthly PayerCurrent conceptMonthly Unique Payers
  • Sports volume, revenue, and realized margin
    DraftKings Sports Consumer Volume measures settled customer wagers or trades across Sportsbook and Prediction Markets, Sports Net Revenue Margin relates current sports revenue to that broader volume, and Flutter sportsbook revenue provides a cleaner sportsbook-only revenue view. Current DraftKings sports scope must not be treated as pure sportsbook handle or revenue.
    Sports Consumer VolumeSports Net Revenue MarginSportsbook Revenue
  • iGaming revenue and sportsbook margin bridge
    iGaming revenue is tracked separately from sports betting, while Flutter decomposes realized sportsbook margin into underlying structural margin, period sports-result effects, and promotional-spend effects. Those drivers explain hold movement without creating a standardized cross-operator margin formula.
    iGaming RevenuePromotional Spend Margin ImpactSports Results Margin ImpactStructural Revenue Margin

See It in Company Research

These companies are examples of how the concept is reported or discussed in public filings. Definitions can differ by issuer; these links open company research rather than a normalized metric comparison.

Explore other companies in this operating model

These companies are linked to at least two other reviewed concepts in the same operating model, but are not currently linked to this concept. This is broader research navigation, not evidence that the company reports an equivalent metric.

Continue Research

Continue from the concept into the Grizzly Bulls research surface that best matches the next question. These links are research continuations, not recommendations or required steps.

Compare stocks

Compare revenue per monthly payer

Compare payer monetization while separating customer scale, product mix, sports outcomes, promotional reinvestment, and cross-product engagement.

Continue research

Explore more topics in the Financial Research Encyclopedia.