Veterinary diagnostics revenue per practice growth measures the change in diagnostics revenue generated by a comparable base of veterinary practices.
IDEXX reported that U.S. average diagnostics revenue per practice grew approximately 6% on a same-store basis in 2025, versus about 2% growth in overall practice revenue.
Revenue per practice captures testing intensity and monetization
The metric can rise through higher test utilization, broader test menus, price, or product mix even if visit volumes are weak, which can support CAG recurring revenue growth.
In 2025, IDEXX reported this growth while same-store clinical visits declined about 2%.
It is not the same as revenue per visit
Practice-level growth includes all activity within the comparable practice base and does not directly divide diagnostic revenue by individual visits.
Use it as a measure of diagnostic penetration and monetization at the practice level.
Primary source: IDEXX 2025 Form 10-K.
Part of the Veterinary Diagnostics Economics
See It in Company Research
These companies are examples of how the concept is reported or discussed in public filings. Definitions can differ by issuer; these links open company research rather than a normalized metric comparison.
- IDXXOpen operating-model research →10 of 10 reviewed concepts in Veterinary Diagnostics EconomicsClinic demand and diagnostics monetization2 of 2 bridge concepts supportedContinue through this bridge:Same-Store Clinical Visit Growth
Continue Research
Continue from the concept into the Grizzly Bulls research surface that best matches the next question. These links are research continuations, not recommendations or required steps.
Compare diagnostics monetization per practice
Compare diagnostics revenue per practice while preserving same-store scope and distinguishing practice monetization from clinic traffic.
Explore more topics in the Financial Research Encyclopedia.