
Actor and producer
Anne Hathaway
Base case$110M
Estimate confidence
★★★★★
3 out of 5
See what supports this page, how current it is, and where comparable or historical context is available.
Base case is our central scenario. Bear and bull cases show how uncertainty around private holdings, retained proceeds, taxes and liabilities can move the estimate.
Rankings use the current base-case estimate and show the wider bear-to-bull range on the full list.
Switch scenarios to see how the total and each component move together. The bars show each positive component's share of the estimated assets in that scenario, not audited holdings.
Forbes named Radcliffe the top-earning actor in its under-25 list after estimating $15M of income between June 2006 and June 2007. In the next annual period, Forbes reported $25M of earnings.
The second report also cited an estimated $50M contract covering the final Potter installments. That contract confirms extraordinary franchise earning power, but adding its face value on top of the annual observations would risk counting the same compensation twice.
Harry Potter generated billions of dollars at the box office, but studio revenue does not become a personal asset without evidence of Radcliffe’s contractual participation. The estimate instead starts with the compensation that Forbes attributed directly to him.
His current investments, property, production interests, taxes, spending, transfers and liabilities are not publicly complete. A wide retained-capital range acknowledges both the strength of the early earnings record and the limits of current disclosure.
Sources[1][2]A reported salary, company sale or brand valuation is not automatically current personal wealth. We show the pieces that can be tied to retained evidence and keep historical flows separate.
The estimate treats those annual earnings as historical flows. Forbes also reported an estimated $50M contract for the final Potter installments, but that contract is context rather than an additional current asset because its compensation overlaps the annual earnings record.
| Component | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated retained film and stage capitalSources[1][2] | $70M | $110M | $175M |
| Estimated net worth | $70M | $110M | $175M |
Forbes estimated Radcliffe earned $15M between June 2006 and June 2007 and $25M between June 2007 and June 2008. The latter report also cited an estimated $50M contract for the final Potter installments, but the contract is retained as context rather than added on top of the annual flow to avoid double counting. Current investments, property, production interests, taxes, spending, transfers and liabilities are not independently valued.
Sources[1][2]We began retaining comparable estimate snapshots on Sep 18, 2026. Earlier Grizzly Bulls figures are not reconstructed unless a retained snapshot exists.
Initial Grizzly Bulls estimate published with consecutive Potter-era earnings observations separated from current retained personal capital.
This is the first retained snapshot, so there is no earlier comparable Grizzly Bulls estimate to show yet.
Forbes named Radcliffe the top-earning actor in its under-25 list with $15M earned between June 2006 and June 2007.
Sources[1]Forbes reported $25M of earnings between June 2007 and June 2008 and cited an estimated $50M contract for the final Potter installments.
Sources[2]Explore other estimates for people with similar careers, industries or estimated wealth.
Numbered citations above link to the retained sources below. External net-worth headlines do not set our estimate.