
Creator, actor and recording artist
Addison Rae
Base case$25M
Estimate confidence
★★★★★
2 out of 5
See what supports this page, how current it is, and where comparable or historical context is available.
Base case is our central scenario. Bear and bull cases show how uncertainty around private holdings, retained proceeds, taxes and liabilities can move the estimate.
Building a research tool or spreadsheet? Search for Roman Atwood with one API request. If a record is available, use its canonical person ID to retrieve its released wealth data.
API results include only records cleared for commercial distribution. A published celebrity page does not guarantee that this person or every field is available through the API.
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY" \
"https://grizzlybulls.com/api/v1/wealth/people?query=Roman%20Atwood&limit=5"If the search returns a match, use data.people[].id in GET /api/v1/wealth/people/{personId} to request the records available for that person.
Free includes 10 requests per day and 200 per month. No payment method needed.
Rankings use the current base-case estimate and show the wider bear-to-bull range on the full list.
Switch scenarios to see how the total and each component move together. The bars show each positive component's share of the estimated assets in that scenario, not audited holdings.
Forbes estimated Atwood earned $2.5M in its 2015 period and $8M in 2016, a sharp increase supported by views, sponsors and other business lines.
Those are historical pretax flows, so taxes, production costs, representation and spending materially reduce the amount that can plausibly survive as present wealth.
Forbes documented touring, film work, a book advance, sponsors and a thriving online store alongside the channel business.
Without current margins or a sale transaction, those activities support a modest brand allowance rather than a large standalone valuation.
Sources[1][2]A reported salary, company sale or brand valuation is not automatically current personal wealth. We show the pieces that can be tied to retained evidence and keep historical flows separate.
Forbes estimated Roman Atwood earned $2.5M in its 2015 YouTube scoring period.
Sources[1]Forbes estimated Atwood earned $8M in 2016, up roughly 70% from the prior scoring period.
Sources[2]Forbes attributed Atwood’s 2016 income to video views, sponsorships, touring, a film, a book advance and an online merchandise store.
Sources[2]The estimate converts documented creator income into retained capital and assigns only a small separate value to merchandise and brand economics whose current profitability is undisclosed.
| Component | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| Modeled retained creator and merchandise capitalSources[1][2] | $13M | $22M | $35M |
| Modeled creator-brand and merchandise valueSources[2] | $2M | $3M | $5M |
| Estimated net worth | $15M | $25M | $40M |
Forbes estimated $2.5M of earnings in its 2015 ranking and $8M in 2016. Those historical pretax flows are discounted for taxes, representation, production, spending and later income volatility rather than projected forward.
Sources[1][2]Forbes documented a thriving online store, sponsors, touring and film work, but no current transaction establishes a standalone value for the creator brand or merchandise business.
Sources[2]We began retaining comparable estimate snapshots on Sep 18, 2026. Earlier Grizzly Bulls figures are not reconstructed unless a retained snapshot exists.
Initial Grizzly Bulls estimate published with retained creator capital separated from bounded brand and merchandise value.
This is the first retained snapshot, so there is no earlier comparable Grizzly Bulls estimate to show yet.
Explore other estimates for people with similar careers, industries or estimated wealth.
Numbered citations above link to the retained sources below. External net-worth headlines do not set our estimate.