Net new awards or bookings incorporate cancellations, while book-to-bill compares that net commercial inflow with current revenue. Together they show whether newly won work is replenishing the revenue base without treating gross wins as guaranteed future revenue.
Listing facts
- SEC issuer name
- ICON PLC
- Ticker
- ICLR
- Exchange
- Nasdaq
- Instrument family
- Not yet reviewed
- SEC issuer CIK
- 0001060955
- Listing source refreshed
- 2026-09-13
Company Research Map
These reviewed encyclopedia concepts are supported by public-company evidence for this business. Operating-model groups show how the reported concepts fit together without implying that every metric in the broader model is reported by this issuer.
Research coverage
Start with an operating model, then move into the supported concepts and economic bridges below. Coverage counts describe reviewed evidence links for this issuer, not standardized KPI completeness.
Contract Research Organization Economics
6 reviewed conceptsConnect clinical-research awards, cancellations, book-to-bill, backlog policy and conversion, near-term revenue visibility, and reimbursed pass-through activity across contract research organizations.
- CRO Backlog
- CRO Backlog Policy
- CRO Book-to-Bill
- CRO Cancellations
- CRO Net New Awards
- CRO Reimbursed Expenses
How these metrics connect
These bridges come from the reviewed operating model. Linked concepts have public-company evidence for this issuer; broader bridge coverage remains explicit when the model contains additional concepts.
Backlog quality, timing, and conversion
2 of 5 reviewed conceptsBacklog captures expected contracted work, inclusion policy defines which work qualifies, RPO preserves a separate accounting boundary, next-twelve-month backlog shows near-term timing, and backlog conversion indicates how quickly the booked work becomes revenue.
Explore the broader operating model
These reviewed concepts belong to the same operating model but are not currently linked to this issuer. That is a research-navigation boundary, not evidence that the company does not report an equivalent metric.
Compare reviewed company examples
These companies share at least two reviewed concepts with this issuer in the same operating model. The company links are research handoffs, not a peer ranking, and reported metric definitions can differ. When both companies are eligible for the published stock-comparison tool, a separate financial-comparison link is available below; it compares supported company financials, not normalized operating-model KPIs.
View 6 shared reviewed concepts
Both companies have reviewed public-company evidence for these concepts. Matching concept labels do not make issuer definitions directly comparable.
View 5 shared reviewed concepts
Both companies have reviewed public-company evidence for these concepts. Matching concept labels do not make issuer definitions directly comparable.