Financial research concept

Theme Park Modified EBITDA Margin

measures Modified EBITDA as a percentage of net revenue under the issuer's credit-agreement-defined non-GAAP framework.

By Lee BaileyPublished Sep 25, 2026
Research context

See what supports this page, how current it is, and where comparable or historical context is available.

Research date
Sep 25, 2026Use the dated article and cited sources for the definition, examples, and stated limitations.
Operating-model context
17 connected conceptsPart of the reviewed Theme Park Economics; issuer definitions remain distinct where disclosed.
Company examples
1 reviewed companyRelationships reflect supported examples, not a normalized cross-company KPI ranking.

Theme Park Modified EBITDA Margin measures Modified EBITDA as a percentage of net revenue under Six Flags' credit-agreement-defined non-GAAP framework.

Six Flags reported 27.1% Modified EBITDA margin in fiscal 2025.

The revenue bridge implies roughly $840 million of Modified EBITDA

In-park revenue of $2.933 billion plus $255.454 million of out-of-park revenue less $88.648 million of concessionaire remittances reconstructs approximately $3.100 billion of net revenue.

Applying 27.1% to that amount implies roughly $840 million of Modified EBITDA.

Modified EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not interchangeable

Six Flags separately reported $792.010 million of Adjusted EBITDA.

The difference between the implied Modified EBITDA scale and reported Adjusted EBITDA shows why the two issuer-defined metrics should remain separate.

Use Theme Park Adjusted EBITDA for the distinct Adjusted EBITDA measure.

This is not a standardized GAAP margin

The numerator follows Six Flags' credit-agreement definitions and adjustments.

Peer theme-park margins may use different exclusions and therefore are not directly comparable.

Primary source: Six Flags 2025 Form 10-K.

Part of the Theme Park Economics

Connect attendance, guest monetization, in-park and out-of-park revenue, operating calendars, seasonal concentration, portfolio footprint, reinvestment needs, and issuer-defined park-level profitability across a regional theme-park operator.

Browse the full operating model in Company Analysis →
Where this concept fits

See It in Company Research

These companies are examples of how the concept is reported or discussed in public filings. Definitions can differ by issuer; these links open company research rather than a normalized metric comparison.

Continue Research

Continue from the concept into the Grizzly Bulls research surface that best matches the next question. These links are research continuations, not recommendations or required steps.

Continue Research

Compare public companies

Compare the 27.1% Modified EBITDA margin with reconstructed net revenue and distinct Adjusted EBITDA.

Explore more topics in the Financial Research Encyclopedia.